Nick Knisely over at Entangled States asked me to write something on the idea of the “Anglican Middle.” I'd been thinking about this for a while - so here's my stab:
I am an Anglican Moderate.
So what is an Anglican Moderate? People from the “Edges” tend to use terms such as “Neither Hot nor Cold” or “Wish-Washy,” implying that a moderate is nothing more than a fence sitter, doing whatever is expedient at the time - taking the easy way. I certainly don’t see myself that way and I certainly have a hard time understanding the conflict I find myself in as an easy way.
So what do I believe as an Anglican Moderate?
I believe in one God, the Father, the Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all that is, seen and unseen. Etc. (See the Nicene Creed for the rest.) I believe in the Creeds, I believe in the scriptures of the Old and New Testament as containing all things necessary to salvation. I believe in the two great sacraments and the five sacramental rites. I believe in the sign of the Historic Episcopate as locally adapted. In short, I am orthodox in the traditional Anglican sense as suggested by the Lambeth Conference over a century ago. I become angered when someone tries to add additional requirements and to hijack the term.
I believe in my own sinfulness – that I share in a state with all other human beings that is derived from our free will to choose to turn away from God. I believe that I have sinned against God and my neighbor, that I am sinning, and that I will sin again. I believe I must maintain a hermeneutic of humility since God is God and I am not.
I believe that our sins become enculturated in both society and in the institutional church. I believe that I am a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, etc. because of the culture I was raised in. I believe that I am blind to my privilege as a white, heterosexual male most of the time. I am aware of the multitude of examples throughout Church History where the church has tacitly allowed, initiated, encouraged and sometimes institutionalized bigotry, prejudice and violence.
I believe that Jesus Christ is Lord and saves us from our sin. I believe, along with Julian or Norwich, that our forgiven sins become scars of honor to our Lord. I believe that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is more powerful that our most treasured prejudice and has the power to reconcile the entire world. I believe that neither the Gospel nor the church it nourishes are fragile constructions – they exist by divine fiat and can be hampered but not ultimately foiled by human choices. All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well.
I believe in the holy catholic and apostolic church throughout the world. I believe that she is both a human and a divine institution. She has warts, but she is still the Bride of Christ. After two thousand years, she survives still despite her prejudices and sometimes-horrific choices. Jesus loves her still.
I believe in the Anglican Tradition – a tradition that holds worship to be our primary theology and other aspects to be secondary - a tradition formed more in the poetry of Herbert and Donne than in the theology of Aquinas or Luther. I believe in a tradition that actively tries to encompass the greatest diversity possible within a single expansive tent - a tradition that honors reasoned discussion and consultation rather than heated rhetoric and political process.
I believe in the Episcopal Church, formed in the crucible of the American Revolution to become the most democratic province in worldwide Anglicanism. I believe in our interdependence and our autonomy. I believe we are called to proclaim both our vision of the church and to listen to the vision of others. I believe we must repent of our American colonialist past and remember that this past colors all dialogue with post-colonial societies.
I believe I am terribly conflicted in this time in our church. I believe the Internet’s hyperfast speed of communications which I both love and loathe, has a lot to do with the sense of urgency that people from both edges seem to feel about this issue. I believe this sense of urgency is overstated in both cases and being used for political gain. I believe that in 100 years, the current conflict will look as strange to Anglicans as the high church/low church fistfights on the floor of General Convention of the 1800s look to us.
I believe the important question is not actually the end, but the means. God can work with any end – that has been proven time and time again. We are not in control of the ultimate end. What we are in control of is the means. When we disagree, do we honestly love one another, or do we demonize them? When people look at us, do they know we are Christians by our love, or do they simply see us as another junior league fighting over who gets to host the tea party?
I believe it is important for everyone to stick to his or her convictions. I believe it is important for the “left” to continue to advocate for their view of justice. I believe it is important for the “right” to continue to hold up the historic witness of the church. I believe the point is not to simply quell dissention. I believe that the loss of either voice is to the detriment of the church.
I believe the “middle” is made up of people with views sympathetic to both “left” and “right” but that many of the beliefs that I have outline above hold us together in a way that is stronger than our political affiliation. I believe the task of the Anglican Moderate is to insist to both the “left” and the “right” that we always remember that we are Christians and Anglicans first, and that the things that unite us (Our faith in the Holy Trinity voiced through Scripture, Creed, Sacraments and Episcopate) are greater than the things that divide us. In the body of Christ, the torso isn’t an exciting part, but it keeps the arms and legs from going off in different directions.
I believe it is our charism as Anglican Moderates to turn to our brothers and sisters on the edges, love them, listen to them, and make our way forward after careful deliberation and measured debate. It is our duty to take the goods that each edge offers and hold them in tension for the benefit of the church catholic so that treasures both old and new can be brought out in God’s time, not ours.
I am an Anglican Moderate. If that makes me a “Fence Sitter,” so be it.
David+